data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b769/8b76927655fb5c3fba2dfd38a4d9de6296f18122" alt=""
The Cirrus design doesn't seem particularly well-considered. The wing is almost laughably short and fat, for example, which will cut the plane's rate-of-climb needlessly and severely limit its ceiling. The short fuselage, stubby wings, and V tail spell "Dutch roll" to me. All in all, it looks a bit like a one-off proof-of-concept homebuilt rather than something that's supposed to go into production. The short, fat wings tell me all I need to know, frankly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7dc0/d7dc0c23480b2182461916383de2fcf55e2fdfa6" alt=""
Cessna will be using a Thielert turbo-diesel in the 172 next year. They didn't bring a 172 to the exhibit hall, but they did bring a copy of the engine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3327/a33272f2b3e14f2f4c2fb97b2fad6b3ae8ad5c90" alt=""
The particular Thielert model that will be used in the 172 will produce 155 horsepower and (according to the chief engineer on the project; the guy in the blue shirt) will actually weigh a bit more than a Lycoming O-360. The engine displaces something like 121 cubic inches. It gets much of its horsepower from turbocharging and sheer rpm (1.6:1 gear reduction at the prop). In fact, maybe it gets a little too much horsepower that way.
Time (between overhauls) will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment